Brunton was born at Musselburgh in Scotland in 1880. She was the daughter of William Neilson Brunton and his second wife Louisa. At the time, Brunson was a building surveyor but went on to run a wire manufacturing business in Musselburgh. Typical of the age, the family was large and in 1910 Brunton decided to make provisions for his three unmarried daughters who at the time were living together at 15, Regent Terrace, Edinburgh.
It is likely she was a student on the teacher training course at Edinburgh College of Art by then. In common with almost all government schools of art, Edinburgh provided no training in fine art (and I don't know why Glasgow was an exception). No one knows whether or not she was introduced to colour woodcut there. Mabel Royds had trained as a teacher at Chester and was on the staff at Edinburgh before she left for India in 1914. All we can say is Brunton's colour woodcuts are in the Japanese manner adopted by many Scottish and English artists of the period and make use a full keyblock and inks applied with a brush. This is apparent in the sky and the brown rocks of Drei Zinnen and is no different from what Ethel Kirkpatrick or Mabel Royds were doing.
But in many other respects, Brunton was different. Her principal training took place under the animal sculptor Edouard Nevallier at his studio in the southern suburbs of Paris and for many years Brunton used a flat on the Boulevard de Montparnasse. The difficulty is I know of only one surviving sculpture. This is a bronze bust of her father belonging to the museum at Musselburgh and although at least one other statue was exhibited at in the bust is all we have to go one at present. At one time, there was a little photo of it online but even that has disappeared so I must rely on my agent in Scotland to make further enquiries because I know my own got nowhere.
It goes without saying that over a career of at least thirty years, there were changes of subject and style, though animals and birds are constant throughout. The fact is so little is available, I can only note the influence of Scottish faux naif early on and Ohara Koson and art deco in the 1920s and assume many of her bird subjects were found in the Jardin des Plantes.
Considering I have a reliable list of twenty-two colour woodcuts by York Brunton, the group of twelve prints I know of in public collections and the four or five currently online is as discouraging as it is enigmatic. She exhibited widely and must have sold her work, so where is it all? Very little turns up, even in Scotland. The gateway was for sale in Scotland some years ago but was too uninteresting to buy and the top three prints illustrated here are coming up for auction at Great Western Auctions, Glasgow, on 13th June, 2026.
The check list draws on the research of a reader in Scotland and Alan Guest's unpublished list of prints. Alan made use of catalogues of the Graver Printers in Colour and the Colour Woodcut Society as well as the small collection held by the British Museum. In addition, my reader made use of catalogues of the Royal Scottish Academy and the Royal Glasgow Institute.
I have assumed there are only two prints of Drei Zinnen.
The pig market, Montreuil 1911
The treadmill 1911
The pergola 1922 (Hoover Museum of Art, Cornell University)
The watchtower 1924
Les cochers 1924
Old gateway 1925
On the Dee, Kirkcudbright 1925
Drei Zinnen from Landro 1925
Sellagruppe 1926
Calendar with owls 1926 (Author's collection)
Tofana 1926
Demoiselle cranes 1927
Aigrettes 1928
Penguins 1928
Pedwell, Norham on Tweed 1928
Summer 1928
Chamaeleon 1928
(St Roch) Rhone 1929
Bullfinches 1935
Donkeys 1936
Monte Cristallo
Drei Zinnen from Lake Misurina






I recall over a decade ago, when posing the question of where all of her work went, I received a churlish comment from a relative of hers asking why I hadn't concluded that she had given them to relatives. I guess this is probably true and it also explains the dearth of her work. You have gone some way to explaining the mystery of her training. Overall she was an uneven printmaker but her ornithological studies in the Japanese style are truly exceptional. Few British artists could capture birds as beautifully. I would rate her skill in this area with Allen Seaby and William Giles. There is a depth in her images that are quite exceptional. My EYB print sits above a Seaby and Kirkpatrick pair in my living room.
ReplyDeleteI suspect the person who contacted you may be the nephew who is selling the work at Edinburgh. I went to see Helen Stevenson's nephew and he is selling prints in the same way. He had quite a lot of unsold work but was unwilling to sell me any.
ReplyDeleteAs for the prints, you are quite right. They are uneven. If I remember correctly, you have the owls which is a good thing to have. I was lucky enough to acquire it with the calendar intact. In the end, it's all down to price but the more I can put online, the more informed people will be about what she could do.
I think you are exactly right again. I do have the owls and I love it. The herons print looks equally as stunning and the background almost looks like it was printed with linen. You sometimes see that effect with shin-hanga but rarely managed so beautifully in Western printmakers. I support your goal of people knowing more about her, because what she did well, she did to a level that few of her contemporaries could achieve. May I ask why the nephew of Helen Stevenson wasn't willing to sell you any?
DeleteI'd not noticed that linen effect. I wonder how she did it. Nor did I know the shin hanga artists made use of linen. I have seen some work printed on linen by Seaby and had to be polite about it but I thought it was pretty dire. Kathleen Rigden Read tried to revive the linen industry at Winchelsea but so far as I know Arthur wasn't tempted to make use of it.
DeleteThe nephew had a good range of prints but when I suggested I would be happy to buy a couple of things, I think he changed the subject. I assume he thought he would get more elsewhere but who knows with these people?
Stevenson's nephew had assumed I was a dealer, which I'm not, and presumably thought I was going to sell on, which I wasn't.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWonderful information as always!
ReplyDeleteI`m very glad to find that Modern Printmakers has been reactivated .
ReplyDeleteFrom the checklist above there must be some doubt that the Pig Market ,Montreuil , and the Treadmill , both from 1911, are colour woodcuts. The exhibition catalogues for the Royal Glasgow Institute simply list them as colour prints. For the following 13 years Brunton only exhibited watercolours at the RGI until Drei Zinnen ( from Landro) illustrated above , was shown in 1925.
The title of the print of the two horse drawn coaches in the shade must be Les Cochers , rather than Fiacres as favoured by London dealers Abbot & Holder.
A friend who is an ornathologist , suggests that the exotic looking finch type birds with the powerful red beaks again illustrated above , are a species of grosbeaks of which there are many subspecies.
I am happy with Clive`s identification of the very stylised
grey long legged birds again shown above , as herons.
John Dixon Brunton (1872-1951) was a successful industrialist in the town of Musselburgh ,just outside Edinburgh.On his death he left the sum of £700,000 to the town of Musselburgh . This paid for the construction of the Brunton Theatre in 1971 . Sadly, the presence of Reiforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RaaC) was detected in the roof panelling in 2023 after which the building was closed .
A decision to demolish it has since been taken.
Jim
Thanks for filling out what we have in the check list. It's all a bit basic still but an improvement on what we had. Trying to match the images we have with the titles on our list is tricky. I suspect Abbott and Holder needed a title and I think we are right.
DeleteI need to correct something I said in my post above.
DeleteI was at the auction house today and took the opportunity to have a quick look at the three bird woodcuts which were still there. The third image down shown above is not of herons as I had thought
but egrets or aigrettes as the artist put it.
How do I know this ? It said so on the reverse !
Jim
I didn't want to contradict anyone but they never looked like herons to me. It just shows, it's always best to look at the picture. This means we have another title we have an image for so thank you the information.
DeleteIt was a silly mistake on my behalf, you even listed the print as Aigrettes in the post. I knew they were egrets, but for some unknown reason I typed heron. I must improve my reading comprehension skills.
ReplyDeleteIt's the Great Egret, Ardea alba, and they have them (along with other water birds) in the Menagerie of the Jardin des Plantes in Paris. It will have been where she drew them.
DeleteCould it be that the birds shown in the second image down are bullfinches even although the colours seem all wrong ?
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a kind of grosbeak but they are not on the Paris list though Demoiselle Crane is. Hawfinch is also on.
Delete